This is an initial implementation that creates a working minimal .i6z document.
It passes schema validation and can be imported into IUCLID.
Caveat:
IUCLID files target individual compounds.
Pathway is not actually covered by the format.
It can be added in either soil or water and soil OECD endpoints.
**I currently only implemented the soil endpoint for all data.**
This sort of works, and I can report all degradation products in a pathway (not a nice view, but we can report many transformation products and add a diagram attachment in the future).
Adding additional information is an absolute pain, as we need to explicitly map each type of information to the relevant OECD field.
I use the XSD scheme for validation, but unfortunately the IUCLID parser is not fully compliant and requires a specific order, etc.
The workflow is: finding the AI structure from the XSD scheme -> make the scheme validation pass -> upload to IUCLID to get obscure error messages -> guess what could be wrong -> repeat 💣
New specifications get released once per year, so we will have to update accordingly.
I believe that this should be a more expensive feature, as it requires significant effort to uphold.
Currently implemented for root compound only in SOIL:
- Soil Texture 2
- Soil Texture 1
- pH value
- Half-life per soil sample / scenario (mapped to disappearance; not sure about that).
- CEC
- Organic Matter (only Carbon)
- Moisture content
- Humidity
<img width="2123" alt="image.png" src="attachments/d29830e1-65ef-4136-8939-1825e0959c62">
<img width="2124" alt="image.png" src="attachments/ac9de2ac-bf68-4ba4-b40b-82f810a9de93">
<img width="2139" alt="image.png" src="attachments/5674c7e6-865e-420e-974a-6b825b331e6c">
Reviewed-on: enviPath/enviPy#338
Co-authored-by: Tobias O <tobias.olenyi@envipath.com>
Co-committed-by: Tobias O <tobias.olenyi@envipath.com>
**This pull request will need a separate migration pull-request**
I have added an alert box in two places when the user tries to predict with stereo chemistry.
When a user predicts a pathway with stereo chemistry an alert box is shown in that node's hover.
To do this I added two new fields. Pathway now has a "predicted" BooleanField indicating whether it was predicted or not. It is set to True if the pathway mode for prediction is "predict" or "incremental" and False if it is "build". I think it is a flag that could be useful in the future, perhaps for analysing how many predicted pathways are in enviPath?
Node now has a `stereo_removed` BooleanField which is set to True if the Node's parent Pathways has "predicted" as true and the node SMILES has stereochemistry.
<img width="500" alt="{927AC9FF-DBC9-4A19-9E6E-0EDD3B08C7AC}.png" src="attachments/69ea29bc-c2d2-4cd2-8e98-aae5c5737f69">
When a user does a prediction on a model's page it shows at the top of the list. This did not require any new fields as the entered SMILES does not get saved anywhere.
<img width="500" alt="{BED66F12-5F07-419E-AAA6-FE1FE5B4F266}.png" src="attachments/5fcc3a9b-4d1a-4e48-acac-76b7571f6507">
I think the alert box is an alright solution but if you have a great idea for something that looks/fits better please change it or let me know.
Co-authored-by: Tim Lorsbach <tim@lorsba.ch>
Reviewed-on: enviPath/enviPy#250
Co-authored-by: Liam Brydon <lbry121@aucklanduni.ac.nz>
Co-committed-by: Liam Brydon <lbry121@aucklanduni.ac.nz>
Bump Python Version to 3.12
Make use of "epauth" optional
Cache `srs` property of rules to speed up apply
Adjust view names for use of `reverse()`
Fix Views for Scenario Attachments
Added Simply Compare View/Template to identify differences between rdkit and ambit
Make migrations consistent with tests + compare
Fixes#76
Set default year for Scenario Modal
Fix html tags for package description
Added Tests for Pathway / Rule
Added remove stereo for apply
Co-authored-by: Tim Lorsbach <tim@lorsba.ch>
Reviewed-on: enviPath/enviPy#132
